I hate that I have to work all weekend long and not watch enough news.
But I try to bring you the sauciest things, like this Facebook group The Mubarak Farewell Party. I think the title is hilarious, it will be held Sunday, January 30 from 1:00am to 11:00pm. It has more than a thousand members already! Feel free to join, celebrations are everywhere!
Nancy,
That's what I'm talking about. Everyone is so worried about what America thinks, how England feels. No. Tell me what Iran's innitial reaction was, cuz Lord knows they choose to step in and "help" any of these nations at protest out... it's on.
^ Here is an article about Iranian opposition leader Mousavi who shows his support to the Egyptian uprising. Clearly Teheran is not in favor of this...
After shutting down the telecommunication systems (internet and phone), Egypt is now targeting the media by shutting down the Al Jazeera bureau in Cairo.
On a side note, joke of the day on Facebook:
Israel changes its relationship status with Egypt on FB to "it's complicated".
Lebanon, Syria & Palestine 'Like' this
A must-read blogpost from Kenan Malik (where has he been all my life?) on how the Muslim Brotherhood was supported by the secular government as an attack dog on progressive elements in the country; also as an insurance policy to maintain Western support ("It's us or the Islamists").
A Norwegian newspaper is claiming to have talked to people who witnessed criminals being let out of jail to create more chaos and confusion. But instead of doing that, many prisoners instead joined the civilian protesters/vigilantes. edit: In Egypt
Friday February 5, 2011.
The Day of Wrath in Syria.
5,000 fans have joined the newly created group on Facebook in less than a couple of days.
THAT will have to be watched closely.
In Egypt, heavy artillery is being used on the protestors. Conflicting reports say Egypt is getting arms from Israel. Oh the irony
In Tunisia, the banned Islamic leader Ghannouchi has returned from London after years of exile. The Tunisians fear his influence and his coming to power which could lead to ensuring an Islamic state as opposed to a laic one.
As fate would have it, I am in Davos, at the World Economic Forum, and not in Cairo. All around me is gloom. The markets are down. Oil is up. A thorny bundle of uncertainties has just been thrown at the fragile economic recovery - just as it was all going so well! The other night, I heard a famous economic pundit admit that someone had asked him only a few days earlier whether events in Tunisia had any significance for the world economy. No, he had said. None whatsoever. But now he was busily eating his words: If Egypt blows, anything could happen.
I don't know what people were saying in Davos or its equivalent in November 1989, because I was in Berlin. But I bet it was more or less the same thing. In 1991, when Ukraine was about to declare its independence from the Soviet Union, President George H.W. Bush made a declaration (this was the infamous "Chicken Kiev" speech) in praise of the Soviet Union. For years, he and his advisers ran around Eastern Europe and the Balkans doing duct-tape diplomacy, trying to piece together again a fracturing world.
Politicians like stability. Bankers like stability. But the "stability" we have so long embraced in the Arab world wasn't really stability. It was repression. The dictators we have supported, or anyway tolerated - the Zine el-Abidine Ben Alis, the Hosni Mubaraks, the various kings and princes - have stayed in power by preventing economic development, silencing free speech, keeping tight control of education and above all by stamping down hard on anything resembling civil society. More books are translated every year into Greek - a language spoken by more than 10 million people - than into Arabic, a language spoken by more than 220 million. Independent organizations of all kinds, from political parties and private businesses to women's groups and academic societies, have been watched, harassed or banned altogether.
The result: Egypt, like many Arab societies, has a wealthy and well-armed elite at the top and a fanatical and well-organized Islamic fundamentalist movement at the bottom. In between lies a large and unorganized body of people who have never participated in politics, whose business activities have been limited by corruption and nepotism, and whose access to the outside world has been hampered by stupid laws and suspicious bureaucrats. Note that the Egyptian government's decision to shut down the country's Internet access over the weekend - something it can do because Internet access is still so limited - had almost no impact on the demonstrators. For all the guff being spoken about Twitter and social media, the uprising in Cairo appears to be a very old-fashioned, almost 19th-century revolution: People see other people going out on the streets and decide to join them.
We are surprised, and no wonder. For the past decade, successive American administrations have sometimes paid lip service to democracy and freedom of speech in the Arab world. Some American organizations, official and unofficial - the National Endowment for Democracy comes to mind - have supported independent human rights activists in Egypt and elsewhere. Some American journalists, such as my Post colleague Jackson Diehl, have cultivated Egyptian democrats, interviewed them, written about them. But to American presidents and secretaries of state of both political parties, other issues - oil, Israel and then the war on terrorism - always seemed more important. Our aid subsidized the Egyptian army and police, and the Egyptians know it. In Cairo, police were firing tear gas labeled "Made in the USA" at protesters.
Hence the gloom. If there are potential leaders in Egypt, other than the stuffy and somehow unlikely Mohamed ElBaradei, then we don't really know them. If there is an alternative elite, we haven't worked with it, as we had worked with the alternative elites in Central Europe in the 1980s. George W. Bush's administration spoke a good deal about "democracy promotion" but then allowed the idea to become confused with the invasion of Iraq. Real democracy promotion - support for journalists, judges and educators; financing of independent media and radio; encouragement of open discussion and debate - has never been a priority in the Arab world.
Our options are now limited. But there are a few, and we should exercise them immediately. We should speak directly to the Egyptian public, not only to its leaders. We should congratulate Egyptians for having the courage to take to the streets. We should smile and embrace instability. And we should rejoice - because change, in repressive societies, is good.
I'm glad people are taking a stand, and of course mortality is something I wish would be avoidable, but at te same time all power to them. I'm seeing all of this happening there and keep thinking about the situation in Argentina, where several of my relatives live. Ten years ago that nation was bankrupt and things was getting better, but now they are just letting its politicians to ass rape them with all sorts of ridiculous taxes, while stripping any form of income the country has left because they used the money to buy themselves into power. And when I say they, I really mean the Kirschners.
Reply With Quote
