Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 176

Thread: The Faux News Thread!

  1. #1
    Join The Resistance Barbarella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Whorelando
    Posts
    7,086

    Angry The Faux News Thread!


  2. #2
    Fake news. beanstew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,101
    Here's a classic from the UK's Daily Wail. Pagan Police!!!1111!one!eleven!!

  3. #3
    OMFG, I hate Faux

  4. #4
    fulfiller of the mullet prophecy eednic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    austin, texass
    Posts
    1,718
    Did you hear? Sarah Palin didn't get a boob job. She takes the fun out of fun bags.

    http://www.sheknows.com/articles/815...-palin-talks-1

  5. #5
    see a sea anemone devnull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Palin
    I want them to hear what it is that I’m saying. It just ends up wasting time and that’s very, very unfortunate. I think some of those folks, too, they need to perhaps grab a shovel, go down to the Gulf, volunteer to help, clean up and save a whale or something
    OK, I agree that her breast size shouldn't even be an issue. But then she has to go and troll the world by saying "save a whale or something"? BITCH PLEASE. What happened to "drill, baby, drill"?

  6. #6
    fulfiller of the mullet prophecy eednic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    austin, texass
    Posts
    1,718
    Ahahhaha! "Save a whale....or you know...have premarital sex...or something!"

  7. #7
    Senior Member Cairn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,235
    Quote Originally Posted by devnull View Post
    OK, I agree that her breast size shouldn't even be an issue. But then she has to go and troll the world by saying "save a whale or something"? BITCH PLEASE. What happened to "drill, baby, drill"?
    I would have loved to heard the tone of voice. I'm sure it was supposed to be condescending.

  8. #8
    Tens Across the Board Banjee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Miami Beach
    Posts
    3,115
    Well, they took Helen Thomas' seat. Way to validate these fuckers.

  9. #9
    Senior Member SoulQuake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    228
    Well, technically the AP got Helen Thomas's seat, but Fox got the front row seat vacated by AP. Not that it makes much of a difference. Besides, they don't even need to be there to fabricate stories. They can do that anywhere!

  10. #10
    Tens Across the Board Banjee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Miami Beach
    Posts
    3,115
    I know, but the move is validating for Fox and for the people that watch Fox. Now their fabricated stories have more weight.

  11. #11
    Senior Member SoulQuake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    228
    True. I was really hoping NPR would get the seat.

    I just re-read my post and realized it wasn't really clear - I wasn't trying to say that it didn't matter who got the seat, if that's how it came across! Just that there isn't much of a distinction (as far as I know) between Helen Thomas' seat and AP's old seat. I definitely didn't want Fox getting either.
    Last edited by SoulQuake; 08-02-2010 at 02:56 PM.

  12. #12
    Join The Resistance Barbarella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Whorelando
    Posts
    7,086
    Sooooooo fair and balanced!


    Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. Gives Big To GOP



    News Corp.'s $1 million contribution to the Republican Governors Association earlier this year would be a notable gift from any company — but Rupert Murdoch's media empire is hardly just any company.

    News Corp. owns the Fox News Channel, The Wall Street Journal, New York Post, the Fox Business Network and more than two dozen local television stations, many with news programs.

    Murdoch, of course, is known for his business savvy, his largely conservative political views, and his belief that much of the American press is skewed to the left.

    "I don't think the million-dollar contribution will make Fox News Channel more right-wing oriented, because, for the most part, I don't see how it could be," says Eric Burns, former chief media critic for Fox News.

    Officials at Fox News, the nation's top-rated cable news channel, declined to comment. They deferred to their parent company, News Corp., whose spokesman Jack Horner rejects the notion that the gift in any way undercuts the professional standing of its journalists.

    News Corp.'s sprawling media empire generates regulatory questions at both the federal and local level, and Horner says the company believes in the importance of free markets and appreciates the Republican group's pro-business agenda.

    Officials and editors at The Wall Street Journal, the jewel in Murdoch's crown, also would not comment for this story, though one staffer says White House officials are already pointing to the News Corp. gift in conversations with the paper's reporters.

    The Journal wrote about the issue in Wednesday's newspaper, though at this writing, it's been awfully hard to find any coverage from Fox.

    'It's A Pretty Bold Move'

    News Corp.'s million-dollar gift represents one of the largest single donations to any American political party this election season. The news was first disclosed in an article by Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

    Political gifts from corporations tend to be fairly balanced — to coin a phrase. They tend to follow power, so the people in control usually get more. But the money generally gets spread around so no one is totally shut out.

    Just this spring, General Electric, the owner of NBC and MSNBC, gave $105,000 to both the Republican and the Democratic governors associations. But News Corp. gave not a dollar to the Democratic governors' group, according to the most recent available records.

    Some observers say the company's actions clearly conform to the ideology held by its owner and the leading figures of its news outlets.

    "It's a pretty bold move," says Sheila Krumholz, the executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics. "On the other hand, I think this is not all that surprising given the very overt attitude and moves made by Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. over many years."

    Other media companies have given money to arms of the two major political parties. For example, so far this year, the cable giant Comcast gave $50,000 to the Republican Governors Association and $100,000 to the Democratic Governors Association; Time Warner (the entertainment and media company that includes CNN, Time Inc.) gave $35,000 to the Democratic governors group; while Time Warner Cable, now a separate company, gave $25,000 to the Republican governors. Comcast is all the more important because it has applied for federal approval to purchase control of the NBC Universal media division from General Electric.

    Corporate giving to federal political parties flourished in the 1990s but stopped cold after the passage of the McCain-Feingold legislation that banned such direct donations. But the governors' accounts are outside federal regulation.

    'Further And Further To The Right'

    In recent years, Fox has begun stockpiling conservative on-air talent. It has added the conservative Glenn Beck, and dropped the liberal co-host Alan Colmes from Sean Hannity's show. The network currently has three plausible Republican presidential candidates working as paid commentators — former Govs. Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich — as well as two top aides to former President George W. Bush — political adviser Karl Rove and chief spokesman Dana Perino. (Rove is also a columnist for The Wall Street Journal.)

    "There is certainly no secret not only that Fox News leans to the right, but if one has watched Fox News in the past couple years, there is evidence that it keeps leaning further and further to the right," says Burns, the former Fox media critic and author of the forthcoming book, Invasion of the Mind Snatchers: Television's Conquest of America in the Fifties.

    Burns says that Fox news shows once brought some balance to TV news by pursuing stories that were wrongly overlooked. Now, Burns says, it's harder to tell the difference between the channel's news and opinion programs.

    This latest revelation revives complaints raised by the Obama administration last fall.

    "We see Fox right now as the source and the outlet for Republican Party talking points," then-White House communications director Anita Dunn said at the time. "It's fine if that's, you know, how they want to build their business model, and we understand that. And it's working for them. And we understand that, as well. But we don't think we need to treat them as though they are a news organization the way other news organizations here are treated," Dunn said.

    After withholding White House officials for interviews on Fox, the White House later relented.

    At an April event at the National Press Club, Murdoch was asked by a liberal activist whether talk show hosts from his channel should support such political movements as the conservative Tea Party.

    Murdoch's response: "No, I don't think we should be supporting the Tea Party or any other party."

    The political activities and contributions of major corporations have long been a source of discomfort for their news employees.

  13. #13
    Remember. Steve SFM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    The American Riviera
    Posts
    6,892
    If anyone still considers Faux to be a "news organization", that person is really motherfucking stupid.

  14. #14
    Ugggggghhhhhhh Octopussy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    6,643

  15. #15
    It is I, you son of a bitch. blissgurl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    952
    My husband, I mean, John Stewart talking about how stupid (or evil) Faux is for not knowing /mentioning that Alwaleed bin Talal is their biggest shareholder. Brilliant!

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mo...t-company-trap

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •